« Home | One down, two to go... » | Screenshot of the Day » | Hiatus to Come » | Screenshot of the Day » | Screenshot of the Day » | Screenshot of the Day » | Screenshot of the Day » | A Survey & Discussion - Extended Takes » | Screenshot of the Day » | Screenshot of the Day »

Taking Care of Business

Time to play catch up, as the crush of the semester has prevented me from tending to things here at even the most minimal of levels. First things first: no more promises, except for that any and all contributions to be inconsistent. It seems that the moment I decide to go on a moderate hiatus, my online time opens up a bit more, and vice versa. Secondly, as another "official" declaration: Screenshot of the Day, as a specifically day to day entry, is no more. Unfortunately, the process became more tedious than expected, since, being unable to watch a movie every day, I quickly had to stretch myself in terms of remembering striking images (that were, in addition, in my DVD collection and ready to be captured). I'll post memorable shots when I have them, but once again, no promises.

One new review over at Slant Magazine, the pretty good and rather sublime J-pop flick Linda Linda Linda, now in limited release in New York. As expected, Ed just asked me to cover the henious looking Let's Go to Prison this weekend, so expect another linked review come Friday or Saturday. Should time allow over the next few days, I hope to put down some of my thoughts on some recent releases, including (roughly in order of my preference) Infamous, The Queen, The Prestige, Borat, and Babel.

Slant Magazine: Linda Linda Linda

In other news, Jim Emerson has been kind enough to link to me on his Scanners blog, and I imagine a good many of you reading this now are here thanks to him. A few posts down you will see my own intended effort at beginning a discussion not unlike his Opening Shots Project (to which I contributed an entry on Fight Club, which can be read here), this time centered around the importance (and examples of) the extended take. Some have contributed so far, and I encourage anyone will feelings on the topic to do the same (p.s. screenshots are darling as well, seeing as what I can provide is limited both by what is already in my collection and my next-to-nothing spending money for renting additional movies of choice). For now, I offer up two below, with accompanying descriptions and screenshots. Both are well known (again, limited DVD collection at my disposal), but are deservingly so, and worthy of the kind of analysis I'd like to foster more of.

I'm as of yet unsure as to what can exactly be called an "extended take"; instinct tells me one minute or more, but even so, I'm about to break that rule so as it is (my argument being that the nature of the scene may in effect make it seem longer than it actually is). So, if you're unsure as to whether or not something qualifies, submit it anyway (this includes sequences partially pieced together with CG work, such as Snake Eyes and War of the Worlds).

GoodFellas (Martin Scorsese, 1990)

Call it mindless adherence to cinematic canon, laziness, or a lack of imagination, but my first contribution to this little project of mine is the famous Copocabana sequence from Scorsese's 1990 masterpiece. At just over three and one-half minutes, it screams of the kind of shot used by a showy director, but Martin seemingly always knows just what pieces are necassary to complete his plethora like cinematic constructions.

P.S. Spoilers ahead.


By this point in the film, the viewer is already very much accustomed to the luxuries afforded by Henry Hill's lifestyle, but this sequence represents his future wife Karen's first experience with its elite offerings. Money drives this world, and the sequence plays like a perpetual outpouring of extravagance that Karen very quicky gets drunk off of. Beginning outside the club on the street, the camera follows them as they pass through the crowd waiting outside, downstairs through a basement entrance, through a maze-like kitchen, and into the main dining hall, where a table is promptly brought out for them right at the front of the stage.


This initial descent into the criminal underworld is masked by the benefits it affords, a necassary point to bear in mind when considering just how much GoodFellas documents Karen's downfall as it does Henry's.


"Every time I come here...every time, you two!"

Pop quiz: what kind of fruit to Henry and Karen sample while navigating the kitchen?


A point I want to make about both GoodFellas and extended takes on the whole lies, I believe, in the relationship between this and another, less acknowledge "extended" take in the same film (the second one being just over forty seconds in lenght, but more than harrowing enough in my book). It is my opinion that extended takes more readily lend themselves to having intoxicating, hypnotic, or alluring effects on the viewer, and Scorsese uses this to the narrative benefit both above - in showing Karen's first experience with the mob - and below, Karen's first experience with mob violence (and, similarly, our first chance to see Henry carry out an act of violence firsthand). Despite their dark undertones, their allure draws both her and the audience into their groove.

Having just learned of Karen's being molested by her longtime friend and neighbor, Henry, pistol packed in his waistline, marches furiously across her suburban street to the perpetrator's residence, with a look of singular intent and ferocious rage exploding just below the surface of his face.

Without a word, he mercilessly pistol whips the sex offender into submission. Is this Henry's first act of altruism in the film, or is it a suburban example of one man claiming his territory over another? Either way, we, the innocent bystanders, are now convinced beyond a doubt that Henry is fully assimilated into his chosen life of crime, as he surely no longer but an errand boy at the cab stand.


Just as the Copacabana sequence exhibits Karen's first sampling from this pool, this more subdued scene shows her first exciting glimpse into the violent side of her significant other (cemented by her declaration: "There are some women who would have gotten out of that situation the minute their boyfriend gave them a gun to hide. But I didn't. I've got to admit the truth, it turned me on").

Might I add that I also love this shot because it exhibits Liotta's trademark intensity, another fine example of which being the criminally underseen 2002 film Narc. Point in case:

Halloween (John Carpenter, 1978)

(More spoilers ahead, and potentially offensive - albeit minor - nudity)

Carpenter's early horror masterwork is a prime example of cinema posing a point-of-view perspective onto the viewer, albeit with only bits and pieces of information revealed at a time. Actually, Halloween's first seven minutes are consumed by not one, but two incredible extended takes, with the initial opening credits zoom-in on an eerily carved pumpkin often getting shafted in comparison to young Michael's first murderous lurk, itself being nearly two minutes in length and just as subtly frightening as nearly anything else in the film. This sequence, however, would be nothing without the immortal Halloween theme playing over it, a prime example of the unity between image and sound afforded only by film.



Next comes the making of a legend. Beginning with a disembodied look at the outside of a seemingly typical residence from across the street, the camera glides towards it, skirting to the side to peer through a window, where a teenage girl and her boyfriend are making out in the living room.



When the two go upstairs and out of sight, the camera moves back out front to look at an upstairs window, a striking chord on the soundtrack accompanying the light within promptly going out. Prompted by this jealousy-inducing signifier of sex taking place, the camera races to the back of the house and, entering the back door, obtains a kitchen knife before awaiting the boyfriend's departure.



Creeping upstairs, a hand reaches outward for a clown mask on the floor, and puts it on. Entering the girl's bedroom, the camera - now partially obscured the mask being worn - acknowledges both the girl's nudity and the obviously messy sheets of her bed before unceremoniously stabbing her to death.






After her bloody body falls to the floor, the killer returns outside just as a car pulls up to the house. It's occupants, and man and woman of apparent parental status, remove the subject's mask. At that moment, the first cut reveals the perpetrator - a young boy, not ten years of age, his face so void of emotion that we wonder what kind of intent, if any, lie in the actions just committed. This is what makes Michael Myers such an unrivaled manifestation of evil - the lack of clear purpose, intent, or drive. The longing for his sister is suggestive enough, but do we ever glimpse enough to explain his future actions? No, and it is that lack of knowledge that makes him even more fearful (take that, Jason Vorhees!), not to mention that this young boy throws to the wind any preconceptions we might otherwise have about the root of evil.

Hmm... I had a very different experience with Linda Linda Linda and the notes that preceded it. The handout that I held in hand as the curtain rose was mostly compiled from film reviews that extensively compared it to the work of Jarmusch. So I went in with rather high expectations that were slightly disappointed. But only slightly.

I know exactly what you mean about the vicious cycle of stating that you will or will not write! I've basically tried to cure myself of the impulse to apologize/justify my lack or dearth of posts. People can figure out on their own how much time I have...

My local film fest wraps tomorrow, and I'm looking forward to finally having time to put some thought into your Extended Takes Project!

Hmm... "lack or dearth." Now how did that happen? I was going for opposites there...

Post a Comment